The Da Vinci Code mind, Dan Brown, is not new to the genre of mysteries and thrillers. The novelist Dan Brown's four novels mystery-thriller. Each of his works include a combination of extensive research, complex, intricate, fascinating, with the wind and conspiracy, action, edge-of-the-seat. "Brown's four novels Digital Fortress (1998), Angels and Demons ( 200), Deception Point (2001) and The Da Vinci Code (2003). In each of Brown's novelsReaders will be met with a prologue, to see the corpse in a very embarrassing situation. In any case, the victim is killed embodies a mystery that is the land or the layout for the rest of the novel. In Digital Fortress, the beginning of the book informs readers of murders and Deception Point consecutive starts with a "Canadian geologists will be thrown from a helicopter to his death." Angles and Demons follows adapt, even if a scientist, Leonardo Vetra, is found dead in his laboratory, andas in The Da Vinci Code, where there is Jacques Sauniere, curator of the Louvre in Paris murdered. Brown's four novels, including "every novel with an epilogue that closes the circle." The epilogue has always taken place after a meeting between the hero and heroine in this.
This can be seen in Digital Fortress, where a romantic encounter that was postponed after the beginning of the introductory chapter. This meeting of the Smoky Mountains before ending a link Tankadoto his estranged father, who is to be across the land. Deception Point is closed in a similar way as their male and female protagonists, Rachel Sexton and Michael Tolland complete an appointment. This precedes an epilogue in which "Ekstrom, the administrator of NASA, its fake meteorite passes over the ocean, where cam". Angles and Demons is following this model, with a meeting between Robert Langdon and Vittoria Vetra, who represents the denouement of the novel, and Da VinciCode, the epilogue brings Langdon to the prologue setting back the Louvre, where Langdon is finally able to grandfather last puzzle Sophie Jacques Saunière (Eder, Doris L.) to manage. Thus demonstrating that in each of Brown's novels, focused on several single object, but he always uses a narrative framework almost identical.
Dan Brown's novels are shameful acts, divided into a number of inconsistencies and conspiracy theories that giveRoute of controversy and criticism. In online contemporary authors, critics attributed the attractiveness of the Da Vinci Code, the action taken in connection with codes and cryptograms which unconsciously compel the reader to brainstorm for answers. However, some critics argue that Dan Brown's novel of 2003, loaded with too much religious history, at the cost of stimulation, but this novel was considered and accepted with open arms by both fans and drug conspiracy thriller (Contemporary Authors). Browncontains a story skeleton of a real company that includes among its members the icons of Western culture, such as Leonardo Da Vinci. see this story in the foreword by Dan Brown "The Da Vinci Code:
FACT:
The Priory of Sion - a European secret society founded in 1099 - is a real
Organization. Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris in 1975 discovered parchments know
As Les Dossiers Secrets, identifying numerous members of the Priory of Sion, including Sir Isaac Newton, Botticelli,Victor Hugo and Leonardo da Vinci.
The Vatican, Opus Dei, as is known, is a deeply devout Catholic sect that the subject of recent controversy due to reports of brainwashing, coercion was, and a dangerous practice known as "corporal mortification." Opus Dei has just completed the construction of a headquarters of the national 47 million U.S. dollars to 243 Lexington Avenue in New York City.
All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate. (Brown1)
The first two statements made by Brown for the Priory of Sion and Opus Dei are mostly valid, but said that some of Brown's measures, which make these groups, are questionable in the book. The real problem with this quotation from the book is the last line about "[all] descriptions ..." because this statement is very unprofessional considering the interpretations he gives the "work of art, architecture, documents and secret rituals ..." can not be guaranteed or supported by arelevant facts. The book begins with the recognition of the existence of a secret society called the Priory of Sion, and the existence of devout Catholic sect Opus Dei. The story begins when a student murders Opus Dei, the Priory of Sion Grand Master, but the night of death, which led to clues to his body, that the conspiracy theories surrounding Opus Dei (Newsmaker) point run. After his body is Robert Langdon, professor of religious symbology at Harvard University foundAnd 'view, dissect the references (Brown 7) is called. Langdon worked with the nephew of Saunière Sophie, who is a police cryptologist. Hence the basic plot of the book, which contains puzzles are trying to resolve these two, the murder of Sauniere, where the mathematical talents to move with the help of "a maze of art, language and codes, and (Newsmaker ). These references lead him and his murderers, the true identity of Sauniere, as the Grand Master of the Priory of Sion, whose soleThe objective is to protect the secrets of Christianity and its origins to the Holy hiding the truth and mystery of the Grail. The book also contains an anti-Catholic sentiment that the church so darker. The site is full of secret codes, anagrams, elaborate technology, pagan sex orgies, sudden reversal, ancient conspiracies, the pre-Christian fertility cults, the Templars, Gnostic Gospels, corrupt police, brutal murder, feminist theory and frantic midnight rides throughParis "(Greeley, Andrew). The reader of these novels forces Supper by Leonardo Da Vinci's works, including Mona Lisa, Madonna of the rockets, and the last. These blends art history, mathematics, and medieval mysticism all make debate and controversy in this book. Therefore, in Dan Brown's novel The Da Vinci Code hit, his theories about the Holy Grail, is the art of Renaissance symbolism and representation of the Catholic Church, for the most the fictionas an essential fact.
It has a wealth of controversy about the origins of the Holy Grail in Da Vinci Code was. If a person is questioned, "what is the Holy Grail," his first thought in most cases is the cup that Jesus drank at the Last Supper. This cup was filled with the blood of Christ and was passed around the table to be consumed by each of the twelve disciples. Popular tradition says that people around the Grailfind the Grail and drinks from it will be rewarded with eternal life. The Grail is to have healing powers for those who come into contact with him thought. This is the most modern and well-known documentation of the Grail. The Da Vinci Code, Brown has a very different interpretation of the Grail. Brown's interpretation of the Holy Grail, the book says:
The Grail is literally the ancient symbol for woman hood, and the Holy Grail represents the sacred feminine and the goddessOf course, now lost, virtually eliminated from the church. Women's power and their ability to produce life was once very sacred, but they represented a threat to the birth of the Church, predominantly male, and so the sacred feminine was demonized and considered unclean. He was the man, not God, who created the concept of "original sin, Eve, and tasted the apple and caused the downfall of the human race. The women, once the sacred giver of life, was now the enemy. (Brown 238)
Even BrownSays the Holy Grail of having the roots of a symbolic representation of the female body as a container or receptacle that the descendant of Jesus Christ instead. In this interpretation, Brown to Mary Magdalene, who believes, for the love of Jesus Christ and brought her daughter to escape. According to Brown, the Priory of Sion were keepers of the Grail that the truth about the Holy Grail promised that contain the knowledge of the line of royal blood and the last home of Mary Magdalene guard. In The Da Vinci Code, the basis forThe plot revolves around the race between Opus Dei and Sophie and Langdon to find the Holy Grail. Opus Dei want to delete the Holy Grail for the sole purpose of exploring for its history of royal blood-line forever, and Langdon and Sophie wants to find the Grail, they keep the truth alive. The Holy Grail is a symbol of the lost goddess Maria Magdalena (Miesel, Sandra). Brown assures that his faith, the Holy Grail, as the descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene from a true creativeTheory of fiction. He explained that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute, but a close companion of Jesus
Their true identity was after Brown, overshadowed by the early church clergy, because they feared the truth would be the Church teachings on celibacy compromised. In order to defend themselves against the power of Mary Magdalene, the Church was to be pursued and a whore. The church buried evidence of Christ's marriage to her, and crushed them, therefore, possible causesthat there is no surviving bloodline of Jesus Christ (Reidy, Maurice Timothy). The Da Vinci Code, Brown has also translated the French term Sangraal, which means in fact the Holy Grail in song or blood, and raal or real royal blood (Brown 250). Brown's game with the concept Sangraal has no credibility outside of his book. These facts are implemented to further undermine the interpretation of Brown's Holy Grail and its lack of true credibility to reveal.
Another area ofError in Brown's The Da Vinci Code, lies in misinterpretation of symbolism in art work of Leonardo da Vinci. Brown interpretations about secret codes in the work of Leonardo da Vinci, the Holy Grail for tips and secrets:
For this reason, Grail enthusiasts still Da Vinci's art and diaries in hopes of digging a hidden reference to the current position Grail fine pores. Some argue that the mountain scenery in Madonna of the Rocks matched the topography of a seriesthe Cave Hill drove in Scotland. Others insisted that the suspicious placement of disciples at the Last Supper was a kind of code. Others, X-rays of the Mona Lisa was originally reported was painted wearing a lapis lazuli pendant of Isis - a detail Da Vinci decided to paint on loans later. (Brown 169)
presentation of Brown's Da Vinci three pieces is highly questionable and often seen as wrong, or in a position to be determined. The book breaks the BrownName Mona Lisa, in the anagram "AMON L'ISA." He goes to explain to readers that Amon is the name of the Egyptian god of male fertility, and the old icon ISA 's "is the Egyptian goddess of fertility. Explains that the name of Mona Lisa in an anagram actually representative of the divine union of male and female (Brown 121). According to Sandra Miesel, novel interpretation of the Mona Lisa is certainly wrong, because "it is widely known to represent a realWoman, Madonna Lisa, wife of Francesco di Bartolomeo del Giocondo. "Hence the name is not a mocking anagram of two
Egyptian goddess of fertility (Miesel, Sandra). Brown believes that Leonardo da Vinci, The Last Supper "with the news that reveals the truth about Jesus and the Holy Grail encoded. Brown argues that the painting shows in every student the right glass of wine, there is no one who has said that the cup might be the Holy Grail. He says that not all twelveYounger men. After the review, in Brown emphasizes that students directly left Jesus' who believed, is St. John, is actually a woman. This woman is supposedly Mary Magdalene (Brown 243-246) Brown's second theory attributed to the lack of a central chalice on the table as proof that the Holy Grail, a sacred chalice is proof that Da Vinci trying to say that viewers really Grail Mary Magdalene (Miesel, Sandra). However, this is unthinkable, and Brown is considered only aMatter of opinion. The person directly to the right of Jesus' Last Supper painting in any way similar to a woman at all. In addition to Brown's theory of Mary Magdalene was present at the right hand of God, he also created fictitious hidden symbols to be found anywhere else in the painting. Brown says there is "indisputable V-shape at the focal point of the painting, which represents the female womb (Brown 244). Brown announced the" unquestionable outline of an enormous,perfectly formed letter "M" (Brown 245). This evidence is evidence that the alleged secret M to Mary Magdalene, however, Brown's arguments that the painting of Leonardo da Vinci-coded messages can not be sustained (Miesel, Sandra) are. C 'was some historians have said that Leonardo da Vinci's work has not been charged with secret messages, but he was guilty of playing with words and numbers (Schorow Stephanie). Browns confusion with the art of fact may be attributed to its strong dependenceGnostic Gospels, which are incredibly simple reading of history and theology (Reidy, Maurice Timothy).
In addition to Brown's many errors about the Holy Grail and the symbolism of Renaissance art, is also guilty of providing false statements on the Catholic Church. The Da Vinci Code, it is obvious that Brown has a strong anti-Catholic prejudice in the course of the novel. Brown is guilty, romance Jabs at the church and the Vatican. This can be seen in s Andrew M. Greeley 'Analysis where "several errors of fact and describes only the latest in a long list of easy to hide Jabs romance at the church hierarchy and the Vatican over decades." Brown portrays the Roman Curia as a smooth, sophisticated schemers who will stop at nothing to maintain the power of the Church (Greeley, Andrew). According to Sandra Miesel, "Brown never misses an opportunity to criticize Christianity and its followers to fear." Brown also shows the Catholic Church as a villainwill stop at nothing to maintain their power. He is also wrong, because after Miesel, "says routine and anachronistic to the Church as" the Vatican, "even when [the popes are not in residence]." The Da Vinci Code also shows the Church as "deceptive, greedy, cunning and deadly" (Miesel, Sandra). Another historical inaccuracy in the brown belt is his use of the term Vatican. He described the Vatican as a "conspiracy to suppress the Gnostic gospels in ConstantineBeginning of the fourth century. The only problem is that the Vatican has ordered a graveyard then.
Brown is also inaccurate in its discussion of someone who calls the Vatican Secretariat, the alleged control of the papal finances. This is wrong because the Secretary of State is actually the one who is control of the finances of the Vatican (Greeley, Andrew). Another aspect of the book, which is not easy to keep pace with murder after the incident Greeleyplotted by Opus Dei. Furthermore, it was inconceivable that the Vatican ever to pay for this act of murder. These aspects of the book are only fantasy and dreams not possible in Brown. Other false claims that "Christ died on the cross, Mary Magdalene was pregnant with baby Jesus', and that the descendants of Mary Magdalene and Jesus created" Medieval French Merovingian (Newsmakers). Therefore, Brown's false claimsagainst the Catholic Church, are the result of his anti-Catholic prejudice, romance Jabs presented misuse of the term "Vatican" and unrealistic situations in the book.
So The Da Vinci Code is a skillfully written read, complete with secret codes, anagrams, ancient conspiracies and brutal murders, and feminist theory, presented by Adventure in Paris. All these aspects of the book open to a broad spectrum of debate. Brown was able to wrap almost all conspiracy theoriesaround the Holy Grail, the art of the Renaissance and the Catholic Church, a masterpiece of false accusations. For most of all theories of Brown impasse lies. The Da Vinci Code, Brown describes the Holy Grail in a familiar way for the masses. Public opinion of the Holy Grail as a chalice or cup that the blood of Jesus Christ at the Last Supper instead. This sacred chalice was to take advantage of healing and eternal life those who had thought. the interpretation of BrownGrail, was that the "sacred feminine, Mary Magdalene. According to Brown, the Holy Grail is actually the truth about the union of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene and their bloodline real. But this interpretation does not apply because there are no facts to his theory. His second error in the magnitude of the errors in this novel is its representation in Renaissance art of Leonardo da Vinci executed. The art, the Brown-analysisBook is that the Mona Lisa, the Last Supper and the Virgin Rocks. In each of these works, which he claims to have tips and secret codes, which led to the closeness of the true Holy Grail.
These assumptions are not valid because art is only one interpretation. Every viewer can see different things in different works of art, and each person can have different interpretations. These assumptions are meaningless, because it is a known fact that Da Vinci is notBurden of his work with the secrets and codes, but he liked to play with numbers. Brown's final argument to the debate takes the issue of its presentation of the Catholic Church. The code Brown expresses a feeling that the anti-Catholic Church as a cunning, clever portraits, and are ready to shrink from nothing in order to preserve their power. These conclusions, which the Church are not new, but are greatly exaggerated. So Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code is a mixture of historical uses blurredFact and a wealth of historical speculation anagrams to deliver a mind truly incredible mystery of secret codes and math mixed with art history and readers of medieval mysticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment